What is required for the second step in terminating parental rights?

The correct response for the second step in terminating parental rights is the preponderance of the evidence. This standard of proof means that the evidence presented must demonstrate that it is more likely than not that the claims concerning parental unfitness are true. In the context of legal proceedings surrounding parental rights, this threshold is significant because it ensures that the decision to terminate rights is based on a solid foundation of proof, balancing the rights of parents against the best interests of the child.

Preponderance of the evidence requires that the evidence tip the scales, suggesting that the likelihood of unfitness exceeds 50%. This level of evidence is less stringent than "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is the standard typically applied in criminal cases, thereby reflecting the civil nature of family law matters. Consequently, establishing a preponderance of the evidence ensures a thorough examination of the circumstances while safeguarding parental rights to some degree.

Other options do not align with the legal standard required for this step: clear evidence indicates a more definitive requirement than what is needed in this context; expert testimony, while potentially beneficial, is not a necessary component for making a determination; and admission of guilt would imply an acknowledgment by the parent which, while impactful, is not a requisite for proceeding with the termination process