What rights were established by the In Re Gault case for juveniles facing charges?

The case of In re Gault significantly expanded the rights of juveniles in the legal system. In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles facing charges are entitled to specific due process rights. Among these rights is the right to timely notification of the charges against them, the right to have legal counsel, and the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. This established that juveniles should have protections similar to those afforded to adults in order to ensure fair treatment in the judicial process.

This ruling underscored the importance of due process in juvenile courts, recognizing that young people also require robust legal protection when their freedom is at stake. The case highlighted the necessity of procedural fairness, ensuring that juveniles, like adults, have the opportunity to defend themselves adequately against charges.

The other options do not capture the full scope of rights established by the In re Gault decision. While the rights to a public trial, to remain silent, and to have expedited decisions are important aspects of the legal system, they either do not directly apply to juvenile cases as defined in Gault or are not encompassed by the ruling itself.